On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:04:49PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 11:27 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:17:03PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192su/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192su/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c
> > > @@ -1690,7 +1690,8 @@ ieee80211_rx_auth_rq(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > //IEEE80211DMESG("Rx probe");
> > > ieee->softmac_stats.rx_auth_rq++;
> > >
> > > - if ((status = auth_rq_parse(skb, dest))!= -1){
> > > + status = auth_rq_parse(skb, dest);
> > > + if (status!= -1) {
> >
> > And again. Did you do this with some tool and not by hand?
> []
> > Did you not run your patch through checkpatch after creating it and
> > before sending it to me?
>
> >From the original 0/13 introduction:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/25/6
>
> Used scripts/cvt_kernel.style.pl:
> --convert-hoist_assigns_from_if
> and verified visually.
>
> checkpatch errors ignored
>
> The script itself is:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/24/447
And this points out why I hate scripts.
It is _trivial_ to fix up the obvious formatting problem, on the same
line that you are modifying, when doing so.
Oh well, I did it by hand for you...
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
