You posted the wrong patch - this is only an interdiff. Also, it might be a good idea to reduce the spacing for all entries, not just these "overdone" ones, to keep them lined-up nicely. On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Alessandro Ghedini <al3xbio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch fixes all the errors and the majority of the warnings found with > checkpatch.pl script in hfa384x.h, following Gábor Stefanik hints > > Signed-off-by: Alessandro Ghedini <al3xbio@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h | 10 ++-------- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h > index 8e39f76..3d440f8 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h > @@ -63,15 +63,9 @@ > /*--- Mins & Maxs -----------------------------------*/ > #define HFA384x_PORTID_MAX ((u16)7) > #define HFA384x_NUMPORTS_MAX ((u16)(HFA384x_PORTID_MAX+1)) > -#define HFA384x_PDR_LEN_MAX ((u16)512) /* > - * in bytes, > - * from EK > - */ > +#define HFA384x_PDR_LEN_MAX ((u16)512) /* in bytes, from EK */ > #define HFA384x_PDA_RECS_MAX ((u16)200) /* a guess */ > -#define HFA384x_PDA_LEN_MAX ((u16)1024) /* > - * in bytes, > - * from EK > - */ > +#define HFA384x_PDA_LEN_MAX ((u16)1024) /* in bytes, from EK*/ > #define HFA384x_SCANRESULT_MAX ((u16)31) > #define HFA384x_HSCANRESULT_MAX ((u16)31) > #define HFA384x_CHINFORESULT_MAX ((u16)16) > -- > 1.6.6.2 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
