On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez<lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez> <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:>>> On 09/14/2009 10:32 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath.h>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath.h>>>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct ath_common {>>>> u8 curbssid[ETH_ALEN];>>>> u8 bssidmask[ETH_ALEN];>>>> struct ath_regulatory regulatory;>>>> - struct ath_ops *ops;>>>> + const struct ath_ops *ops;>>>>>> If I'm looking correctly, this will emit a warning for ath9k.>>>> Hm, I'm using C=1 when compiling and see no warnings even from sparse.>> Well, as my tree is now, let me rebase and see how it was back then, I> thought I tested compiled that patch.
Yeah looks peachy.
Luis_______________________________________________devel mailing listdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
