>> - otus. This is sitting here until a "real" wireless driver>> will be merged through the wireless tree. Hopefully that>> happens soon.>> ar9170 has been in for a while now, it's just not quite at feature> parity yet -- however that also means otus will get no work whatsoever> from any of the wireless folks. Draw your own conclusions. Personally, I> would drop it and let the users figure out whether they can live with> ar9170 or need to support work on it. Greg, as Johannes noted otus has lacked focus as Johannes whipped outa port for it in a few weeks and then Christian gave it some finallove taps for inclusion, we just still use otus as just a source ofdocumentation for any yet missing feature, but for that I guess I canjust refer people to my git tree. Chris would know better where we'reat as far as feature-parity is concerned though so I'll leave it up tohim to judge whether or not having otus gets some users anythingar9170 doesn't yet have. Luis_______________________________________________devel mailing listdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
