Jonathan Campbell wrote: > > So far I've tested it against 2.6.25.17 and 2.6.28 on both x86 and > x86_64 with reads, writes, directory creation, symlink creation, and > mmap() and it seems to work fine. > Just give it a range of memory on the bus, or the > domain:bus:device:function numbers of a VGA PCI device, and it will > mount the VGA video RAM and allow files to exist there. > As a special hack: you can also specify the size of the active > framebuffer console so that fbcon doesn't collide with this driver > (unless you want to see what your files look like splattered across your > screen, ha). The active VRAM area becomes a "sentinel" file named > "framebuffer". > > What do you guys think? > How is this different from the MTD driver we already have? -hpa
