Hi, Back from a week of vacation, I have tried the patch with a vanilla 2.6.26 and it seems to work just fine. Regards, Henrik > Henrik Kurelid wrote on 2008-08-01: >> There was one major problem with the patch mentioned earlier. The >> isochronous setup code is commented out (I guess since it uses the >> deprecated interface.) > > This interface was removed in the mainline in 2.6.23(-rc1). > >> I have been doing some additional work on the driver the last weeks. >> Apart from the writing new iso setup code I have added CI descrambling >> support and some CI MMI support. I have created a patch at >> http://firesat.kurelid.se/firesat-ci-2.6.24.3-v3.patch with my additions. >> (It is to be applied after the patch at >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/patches/bad/ldp/dvb-add-firesat-driver.patch). > > I now took the "current" version of dvb-add-firesat-driver.patch from > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git;a=blob;f=dvb-add-firesat-driver.patch > (this is the version you used plus device-recognition.patch from > http://firedtv.bbackx.com/index.php?q=node/5 ), also applied Ben's other > patch for DVB-S on DVB-S2 devices, and then applied your patch. I got > two rejects which looked trivial. I also removed all trailing > whitespace from your patch. The result is temporarily available here: > http://user.in-berlin.de/~s5r6/linux1394/firedtv/ > > Henrik, could you please test if this version still works? > > Also, please look at the changelog of > 04-firesat-update-isochronous-interface-add-ci-support.patch and send me > a Signed-off-by line for it if everything is OK. Also remember to add a > good changelog and your Signed-off-by (with the implications as stated > in linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches) when you send additional patches. > > Thanks, > -- > Stefan Richter > -=====-==--- =--- -==-- > http://arcgraph.de/sr/ >
