On 10/31/07, Frank Mori Hess <fmhess at speakeasy.net> wrote: > Your list seems to be a combination of 2 independent goals. One, being > general improvement to comedi, and the other changes specifically for > kernel inclusion. I suspect this is due to your belief that drivers need > to be very mature and stable interface-wise before being worthy of > inclusion in the main kernel tree. Oh no, it's not that I feel that it's a matter of being "worthy" of inclusion in the kernel... but if there is going to be some effort expended in cleaning up some of the drivers for inclusion, it's not a bad opportunity to try and shore up and document the darker corners of the API. But you're right, some of the items on my list do overemphasize "freezing" the API. In any case, are there particular items on the list that aren't worth doing or that you'd like to see extra emphasis on? -Tabish
