On Tue 2021-06-22 17:36:39, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:06:31PM +0800, Jia He wrote: > > This helper is similar to d_path() except that it doesn't take any > > seqlock/spinlock. It is typical for debugging purposes. Besides, > > an additional return value *prenpend_len* is used to get the full > > path length of the dentry, ingoring the tail '\0'. > > the full path length = end - buf - prepend_length - 1 > > Missed period at the end of sentence. > > > Previously it will skip the prepend_name() loop at once in > > __prepen_path() when the buffer length is not enough or even negative. > > prepend_name_with_len() will get the full length of dentry name > > together with the parent recursively regardless of the buffer length. > > > If someone invokes snprintf() with small but positive space, > > prepend_name_with_len() moves and copies the string partially. > > > > More than that, kasprintf() will pass NULL _buf_ and _end_ as the > > parameters. Hence return at the very beginning with false in this case. > > These two paragraphs are talking about printf() interface, while patch has > nothing to do with it. Please, rephrase in a way that it doesn't refer to the > particular callers. Better to mention them in the corresponding printf() > patch(es). The two paragraphs are actually repeated in the 2nd patch. Unfortunately, they do not make sense there either because they comment code that is modified in this patch. We could describe it here a generic way. For example: prepend_name_with_len() moves and copies the path when the given buffer is not big enough. It cuts off the end of the path. It returns immediately when there is no buffer at all. Best Regards, Petr
