Re: Are documentation-only patches welcomed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:26:06PM -0500, Grzegorz Zdanowski wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> While dipping my toes in Linux kernel programming I discovered that a
> lot of functions, even exported ones, lack any comment blocks or
> references to documentation. Most of the time I have to resort to the
> original commit message + LKML threads associated with a given
> function.
> 
> Is this intentional, or is it simply a by-product of the lack of
> developer's time? If it's the latter, are documentation-only patches
> welcomed?

Absolutely welcome.

I would suggest that you focus on a particular subsystem so that you
get really deeply knowledgable about it and the bits of the kernel it
interacts with.  Also that you work with/through the maintainer and
mailing list for that part of the kernel rather than with linux-doc.
You can always cc linux-doc, of course, for getting review from people
who have expertise in documentation writing, but domain-specific expertise
is also needed.



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux