On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 11:39:52 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This fixes redzoning vs the freelist pointer (both for middle-position > and very small caches). Both are "theoretical" fixes, in that I see no > evidence of such small-sized caches actually be used in the kernel, but > that's no reason to let the bugs continue to exist, especially since > people doing local development keep tripping over it. :) So I don't think this is suitable -stable material? It's a bit odd that patches 2&3 were cc:stable but #1 was not. Makes one afraid that 2&3 might have had a dependency anyway. So I'm thinking that the whole series can just be for 5.14-rc1, in the sent order.
