On 6/7/21 5:47 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> I am using these more "generic terms" because they are also used by the timerlat >> tracer. >> >> In the timerlat tracer, the "in" file is used to stop the tracer for a given IRQ >> latency (so, the "inside" operation), while the "out" is used to stop the tracer >> in the thread latency (hence the outside operation). >> >> The total sounds good for the "out"! But the single does not work fine for the >> IRQ... how about: stop_tracing_partial_us ? >> >> It is hard to find a good shared name :-/ > What about: > > stop_tracing_us and stop_tracing_total_us, and not have anything > special for the first one? I cannot find a better name... and it makes sense: if an "in" value on osnoise or an IRQ latency on timerlat is higher than "stop_tracing_us"... it is more important than the total... so it indeed deserves the more intuitive name. (working on osnoise changes now...) -- Daniel > -- Steve >
