Re: [PATCH 34/34] docs: x86: avoid using ReSt :doc:`foo` markup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:18:33PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py.
> So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  Documentation/x86/boot.rst | 4 ++--
>  Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
> index fc844913dece..894a19897005 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
> @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ follow::
>  In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct
>  boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should
>  also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as
> -described in chapter :doc:`zero-page`.
> +described in chapter Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst.
>  
>  After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load the
>  32/64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol.
> @@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ can be calculated as follows::
>  In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct
>  boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should
>  also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as described
> -in chapter :doc:`zero-page`.
> +in chapter Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst.
>  
>  After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load
>  64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol, but
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst b/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
> index c5b695d75349..9f0b1851771a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ are aligned with platform MTRR setup. If MTRRs are only set up by the platform
>  firmware code though and the OS does not make any specific MTRR mapping
>  requests mtrr_type_lookup() should always return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID.
>  
> -For details refer to :doc:`pat`.
> +For details refer to Documentation/x86/pat.rst.
>  
>  .. tip::
>    On Intel P6 family processors (Pentium Pro, Pentium II and later)
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux