The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py. So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst index 1c0a75a51d79..0dc3fb0d9544 100644 --- a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst +++ b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst @@ -20,10 +20,10 @@ LSM hook: Other LSM hooks which can be instrumented can be found in ``include/linux/lsm_hooks.h``. -eBPF programs that use :doc:`/bpf/btf` do not need to include kernel headers -for accessing information from the attached eBPF program's context. They can -simply declare the structures in the eBPF program and only specify the fields -that need to be accessed. +eBPF programs that use Documentation/bpf/btf.rst do not need to include kernel +headers for accessing information from the attached eBPF program's context. +They can simply declare the structures in the eBPF program and only specify +the fields that need to be accessed. .. code-block:: c @@ -88,8 +88,9 @@ example: The ``__attribute__((preserve_access_index))`` is a clang feature that allows the BPF verifier to update the offsets for the access at runtime using the -:doc:`/bpf/btf` information. Since the BPF verifier is aware of the types, it -also validates all the accesses made to the various types in the eBPF program. +Documentation/bpf/btf.rst information. Since the BPF verifier is aware of the +types, it also validates all the accesses made to the various types in the +eBPF program. Loading ------- -- 2.31.1
