On 02/06/2021 21:48, Beata Michalska wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 07:17:12PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >> On 27/05/2021 19:07, Beata Michalska wrote: >>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 05:08:42PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >>>> On 26/05/2021 23:40, Beata Michalska wrote: >>>>> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 08:17:41PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >>>>>> On 26/05/2021 14:51, Beata Michalska wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 01:15:46PM +0100, Beata Michalska wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:52:25AM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 25/05/2021 12:29, Beata Michalska wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:53:07AM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 24/05/21 23:55, Beata Michalska wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 07:01:04PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/05/21 11:16, Beata Michalska wrote: [...] > So what I have done is : > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c > index 77e6f79235ad..ec4ae225687e 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c > @@ -1324,6 +1324,7 @@ asym_cpu_capacity_classify(struct sched_domain *sd, > if (!asym_cap_miss) > sd_asym_flags |= SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL; > > + WARN_ONCE(cpu_smt_flags() & sd->flags, "Detected CPU capacity asymmetry on SMT level"); > leave: > return sd_asym_flags; > } > > Comment can be adjusted. > This would sit in the classify function to nicely wrap asymmetry bits in one > place. What do you think ? ... and you would need to pass in the sched domain pointer ;-) Still prefer to check it in sd_init() since there is where we set the flags. But you can't do 'cpu_smt_flags() & sd->flags'. MC level would hit too, since it has SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES as well.
