Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > So we'd need Gene's, Christopher's, William's, and Steve's ack on adding > the GPL alternative to the GFDL-1.2 licence. That would be great. One other thing that crosses my mind...we'll need to remove the GFDL license text as well. That's already technically a violation to have within a GFDL-licensed document, since it cannot be distributed under the terms of that license. We have the GFDL text already in LICENSES/deprecated/GFDL-1.2 if you want to refer to it (but the SPDX tag is sufficient for that as well). Thanks, jon
