Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] Driver of Intel(R) Gaussian & Neural Accelerator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

Am 17.05.21 um 09:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:00:38AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:34 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 01:00:26PM +0200, Maciej Kwapulinski wrote:
Dear kernel maintainers,

This submission is a kernel driver to support Intel(R) Gaussian & Neural
Accelerator (Intel(R) GNA). Intel(R) GNA is a PCI-based neural co-processor
available on multiple Intel platforms. AI developers and users can offload
continuous inference workloads to an Intel(R) GNA device in order to
free
processor resources and save power. Noise reduction and speech recognition
are the examples of the workloads Intel(R) GNA deals with while its usage
is not limited to the two.

How does this compare with the "nnpi" driver being proposed here:
         https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210513085725.45528-1-guy.zadicario@xxxxxxxxx

Please work with those developers to share code and userspace api and
tools.  Having the community review two totally different apis and
drivers for the same type of functionality from the same company is
totally wasteful of our time and energy.

Agreed, but I think we should go further than this and work towards a
subsystem across companies for machine learning and neural networks
accelerators for both inferencing and training.

We have, it's called drivers/gpu. Feel free to rename to drivers/xpu or
think G as in General, not Graphisc.

I hope this was a joke.

Just some thoughts:

AFAICT AI first came as an application of GPUs, but has now evolved/specialized into something of its own. I can imagine sharing some code among the various subsystems, say GEM/TTM internals for memory management. Besides that there's probably little that can be shared in the userspace interfaces. A GPU is device that puts an image onto the screen and an AI accelerator isn't. Treating both as the same, even if they share similar chip architectures, seems like a stretch. They might evolve in different directions and fit less and less under the same umbrella.

And as Dave mentioned, these devices are hard to obtain. We don't really know what we sign up for.

Just my 2 cents.

Best regards
Thomas



--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux