Re: [RFC PATCH V2 9/9] tracing: Add timerlat tracer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel,

Just a couple of things I noticed while playing with this nice additon.

On 23/04/21 23:05, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:

...

> +/**
> + * tlat_var_reset - Reset the values of the given timerlat_variables
> + */
> +static inline void tlat_var_reset(void)
> +{
> +	struct timerlat_variables *tlat_var;
> +	int cpu;
>  	/*
>  	 * So far, all the values are initialized as 0, so
>  	 * zeroing the structure is perfect.
>  	 */
> -	memset(osn_var, 0, sizeof(struct osnoise_variables));
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
> +		memset(tlat_var, 0, sizeof(struct timerlat_variables));
> +		tlat_var = per_cpu_ptr(&per_cpu_timerlat_var, cpu);

Think these two above want to be the other way around?

> +	}
>  }

...

> +#ifdef CONFIG_TIMERLAT_TRACER
> +static void timerlat_tracer_start(struct trace_array *tr)
> +{
> +	int retval;
> +
> +	if (osnoise_busy)
> +		return;
> +
> +	retval = __osnoise_tracer_start(tr);
> +	if (retval)
> +		goto out_err;
> +
> +	osnoise_data.timerlat_tracer = 1;

It seems this needs to be set before calling __osnoise_tracer_start()?

Thanks!

Juri




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux