On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:06:18PM +0200, Maciej Kwapulinski wrote: > > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 01:00:38PM +0200, Maciej Kwapulinski wrote: > >> The new 'misc' device is the node for applications in user space to > >> interact with the driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Maciej Kwapulinski <maciej.kwapulinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Tested-by: Savo Novakovic <savox.novakovic@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > >> drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.h | 11 +++---- > >> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.c b/drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.c > >> index 0e31b8c6bb70..1e6345a8325b 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.c > >> +++ b/drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.c > >> @@ -20,6 +20,18 @@ module_param(recovery_timeout, int, 0644); > >> MODULE_PARM_DESC(recovery_timeout, "Recovery timeout in seconds"); > >> #endif > >> > >> +struct file; > >> + > >> +static int gna_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f) > >> +{ > >> + return -EPERM; > >> +} > > > > That sucks, why have an open that does nothing but fail? > > next patch provides complete implementation of gna_open(), here it's > just a protection if someone would incidentally run gna in the middle of patch series Then don't provide an open at all, and it will be fine :) > > > > >> + > >> +static const struct file_operations gna_file_ops = { > >> + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > >> + .open = gna_open, > >> +}; > >> + > >> static void gna_devm_idr_destroy(void *data) > >> { > >> struct idr *idr = data; > >> @@ -27,6 +39,36 @@ static void gna_devm_idr_destroy(void *data) > >> idr_destroy(idr); > >> } > >> > >> +static void gna_devm_deregister_misc_dev(void *data) > > > > Why is this a void *? > > it goes to devm_add_action() api. Ah. That's not obvious :(