Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Beata Michalska wrote:

> > > Where:
> > >  arch_scale_cpu_capacity(L) = 512
> > >  arch_scale_cpu_capacity(M) = 871
> > >  arch_scale_cpu_capacity(B) = 1024
> > 
> > Low, High
> > Small, Big
> > 
> > But you appear to have picked: Low and Big, which just doesn't make any
> > sense. (Worse, L can also be Large :-)
> >
> (L)ittle, (M)edium, (B)ig
> I can re-arrange the abbreviations used here.

Duh, I must really be having a bad day for not thinking of Little. I
don't think you need to change this. S,M,L would be like a clothing
store, but steps away from the big.Little thing.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux