On 5/3/21 5:54 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 29/04/21 03:00, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, Valeriy Vdovin wrote: >>> It's very explicit by the code that it was designed to receive some >>> small number of entries to return E2BIG along with the corrected >>> number. >> >> LOL, saying KVM_GET_CPUID2 was "designed" is definitely giving the KVM >> forefathers the benefit of the doubt. > > I was going to make a different joke, i.e. that KVM_GET_CPUID2 was > indeed designed the way Valeriy described, but that design was > forgotten soon after. > > Really, this ioctl has been such a trainwreck that I think the only > good solution here is to drop it. > > Paolo > should we discuss KVM_GET_CPUID3 which will work "normally"? Den
