On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:13:19 +0200 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Provides a "cpus" interface to the hardware latency detector. By > default, it lists all CPUs, allowing hwlatd threads to run on any online > CPU of the system. > > It serves to restrict the execution of hwlatd to the set of CPUs writing > via this interface. Note that hwlatd also respects the "tracing_cpumask." > Hence, hwlatd threads will run only on the set of CPUs allowed here AND > on "tracing_cpumask." > > Why not keep just "tracing_cpumask"? Because the user might be interested > in tracing what is running on other CPUs. For instance, one might run > hwlatd in one HT CPU while observing what is running on the sibling HT > CPU. The cpu list format is also more intuitive. > > Also in preparation to the per-cpu mode. OK, I'm still not convinced that you couldn't use tracing_cpumask here. Because we have instances, and tracing_cpumask is defined per instance, you could simply do: # cd /sys/kernel/tracing # mkdir instances/hwlat # echo a > instances/hwlat/tracing_cpumask # echo hwlat > instances/hwlat/current_tracer Now the tracing_cpumask above only affects the hwlat tracer. I'm just reluctant to add more tracing files if the current ones can be used without too much trouble. For being intuitive, let's make user space tools hide the nastiness of the kernel interface ;-) -- Steve
