Re: [PATCH] docs: pin-control: Fix error path for control state example

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: pin-control: Fix error path for control state example
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:03:11 +0200
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20210328164222.720525-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
References: <20210328164222.720525-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>

On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 6:42 PM Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The error is constructed using the wrong variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Patch applied!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

References:
- [PATCH] docs: pin-control: Fix error path for control state example
  - From: Niklas Söderlund

Prev by Date: [PATCH] docs/zh_CN: sync reporting-issues.rst
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] module: Add printk format to add module build ID to stacktraces
Previous by thread: [PATCH] docs: pin-control: Fix error path for control state example
Next by thread: [PATCH net-next v3] net: x25: Queue received packets in the drivers instead of per-CPU queues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux