On 26.03.21 07:13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Lo! Since a few months mainline in > Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst contains a text written > to obsolete the good old reporting-bugs text. For now, the new document > still contains a warning at the top that basically says "this is WIP". > But I'd like to remove that warning and delete reporting-bugs.rst in the > next merge window to make reporting-issues.rst fully official. With this > mail I want to give everyone a chance to take a look at the text and > speak up if you don't want me to move ahead for now. > > For easier review I'll post the text of reporting-issues.rst in reply to > this mail. I'll do that in a few chunks, as if this was a cover letter > for a patch-set. Here we go: .. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR CC-BY-4.0) .. If you want to distribute this text under CC-BY-4.0 only, please use 'The Linux kernel developers' for author attribution and link this as source: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst .. Note: Only the content of this RST file as found in the Linux kernel sources is available under CC-BY-4.0, as versions of this text that were processed (for example by the kernel's build system) might contain content taken from files which use a more restrictive license. Reporting issues ++++++++++++++++ The short guide (aka TL;DR) =========================== If you're facing multiple issues with the Linux kernel at once, report each separately to its developers. Try your best guess which kernel part might be causing the issue. Check the :ref:`MAINTAINERS <maintainers>` file for how its developers expect to be told about issues. Note, it's rarely `bugzilla.kernel.org <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/>`_, as in almost all cases the report needs to be sent by email! Check the destination thoroughly for existing reports; also search the LKML archives and the web. Join existing discussion if you find matches. If you don't find any, install `the latest Linux mainline kernel <https://kernel.org/>`_. Make sure it's vanilla, thus is not patched or using add-on kernel modules. Also ensure the kernel is running in a healthy environment and is not already tainted before the issue occurs. If you can reproduce your issue with the mainline kernel, send a report to the destination you determined earlier. Make sure it includes all relevant information, which in case of a regression should mention the change that's causing it which can often can be found with a bisection. Also ensure the report reaches all people that need to know about it, for example the security team, the stable maintainers or the developers of the patch that causes a regression. Once the report is out, answer any questions that might be raised and help where you can. That includes keeping the ball rolling: every time a new rc1 mainline kernel is released, check if the issue is still happening there and attach a status update to your initial report. If you can not reproduce the issue with the mainline kernel, consider sticking with it; if you'd like to use an older version line and want to see it fixed there, first make sure it's still supported. Install its latest release as vanilla kernel. If you cannot reproduce the issue there, try to find the commit that fixed it in mainline or any discussion preceding it: those will often mention if backporting is planed or considered too complex. If backporting was not discussed, ask if it's in the cards. In case you don't find any commits or a preceding discussion, see the Linux-stable mailing list archives for existing reports, as it might be a regression specific to the version line. If it is, report it like you would report a problem in mainline (including the bisection). If you reached this point without a solution, ask for advice one the subsystem's mailing list.
