Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Right now, if one of the following headers end with a '::', the > kernel-doc script will do the wrong thing: > > description|context|returns?|notes?|examples? > > The real issue is with examples, as people could try to write > something like: > > example:: > > /* Some C code */ > > and this won't be properly evaluated. So, improve the regex > to not catch '\w+::' regex for the above identifiers. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > scripts/kernel-doc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Ah....wouldn't it be nice if kerneldoc comments had just been RST from the beginning? I don't think we're fixing that at this point, though, so this makes sense; applied. Thanks, jon
