On 10:05 Thu 25 Mar 2021, Miroslav Benes wrote:
Hi, On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:s/varibles/variables/ Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644 --- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow variables alongside their parent objects. Or a livepatch fix may -require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances. In +require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances. In these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach shadow variables to parents already in-flight.you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it.
Ah..difficult to remember....thanks for reminding ..it seems I need to keep track ...which I don't do at this moment ...so the patch get duplicated .. So.do you have any better policy to keep track???
Miroslav
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
