HTML mail? Quoting Konstantin Khlebnikov (2021-03-24 01:23:55) > 24.03.2021, 05:04, "Stephen Boyd" <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Looks too noisy for me. Maybe print id in the line "Modules linked in:"? > I suppose only out-of-tree modules need this? > Please see this note in patch 4: Originally, I put this on the %pS format, but that was quickly rejected given that %pS is used in other places such as ftrace where build IDs aren't meaningful. There was some discussions on the list to put every module build ID into the "Modules linked in:" section of the stacktrace message but that quickly becomes very hard to read once you have more than three or four modules linked in. It also provides too much information when we don't expect each module to be traversed in a stacktrace. Having the build ID for modules that aren't important just makes things messy. Splitting it to multiple lines for each module quickly explodes the number of lines printed in an oops too, possibly wrapping the warning off the console. And finally, trying to stash away each module used in a callstack to provide the ID of each symbol printed is cumbersome and would require changes to each architecture to stash away modules and return their build IDs once unwinding has completed.
