Hi Thorsten, Just a couple of small nits (or one that is repeated): On 2/9/21 9:48 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Replace placeholder text about decoding stack traces with a section that > properly describes what a typical user should do these days. To make > it works for them, add a paragraph in an earlier section to ensure > people build their kernels with everything that's needed to decode stack > traces later. > > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst | 77 +++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst > index 07879d01fe68..b9c07d8e3141 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst > @@ -154,8 +154,8 @@ After these preparations you'll now enter the main part: > that hear about it for the first time. And if you learned something in this > process, consider searching again for existing reports about the issue. > > - * If the failure includes a stack dump, like an Oops does, consider decoding > - it to find the offending line of code. > + * If your failure involves a 'panic', 'oops', or 'warning', consider decoding > + the kernel log to find the line of code that trigger the error. triggered > > * If your problem is a regression, try to narrow down when the issue was > introduced as much as possible. > @@ -869,6 +869,15 @@ pick up the configuration of your current kernel and then tries to adjust it > somewhat for your system. That does not make the resulting kernel any better, > but quicker to compile. > > > Check 'taint' flag > ------------------ > @@ -923,31 +932,55 @@ instead you can join. > Decode failure messages > ----------------------- > > -.. note:: > + *If your failure involves a 'panic', 'oops', or 'warning', consider > + decoding the kernel log to find the line of code that trigger the error.* triggered or it could be "code that triggers"... (just not "trigger"). -- ~Randy