Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > As Jon previously noted [1], it would be nice if automarkup supported relative > paths as well when cross-referencing to other documents. This adds the support > for it, and documents it. > > Jon, after applying this, 43bc3ed73639 ("docs: dt: Use full path to enable > cross-reference") could be reverted without the link stopping to work. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20201130142404.6ef6689e@xxxxxxx/ > > Nícolas F. R. A. Prado (2): > docs: Enable usage of relative paths to docs on automarkup > docs: Document cross-referencing using relative path > > Documentation/doc-guide/sphinx.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++---------- > Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py | 7 +++++-- > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) So I finally got around to playing with this set. One thing I found is that some of the references that were being caught before were not now... after far too much time, I figured out that the problem was references to .txt files, of which we have quite a few in the docs. admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt in particular is quite popular. Before this change, those were being turned into xrefs, afterward not. To address that, I applied this little tweak: -RE_doc = re.compile(r'(\bDocumentation/)?((\.\./)*[\w\-/]+)\.rst') +RE_doc = re.compile(r'(\bDocumentation/)?((\.\./)*[\w\-/]+)\.(rst|txt)') That seems to make things work properly again. While tracking this down I put in a print for failing cross references, and noted that we have quite a few; it's a useful way to see where the stale references are. Maybe I'll try to hack together something to make those stand out so we can fix them. Thanks, jon