Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Cao jin <jojing64@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT
From: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:54:40 +0100
Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210127084911.63438-1-jojing64@gmail.com>
References: <20210127084911.63438-1-jojing64@gmail.com>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:49:11PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> struct setup_data.len is the length of data field. In case of
> SETUP_INDIRECT, it should be sizeof(setup_indirect).
>
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <jojing64@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>

Daniel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT
  - From: Jonathan Corbet

References:
- [PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT
  - From: Cao jin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] include: sysfs: Add macro to assign show for RO attributes
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] include: sysfs: Add macro to assign show for RO attributes
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux