On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:01 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Milan Lakhani <milan.lakhani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > [CC += Rob] > > > There were two references to > > Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst for dtb format > > information. This file has been removed, so I have changed the links to > > Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst for this information, which > > itself points to https://elinux.org/Device_Tree_Usage for an overview of > > the device tree data format. > > > > Signed-off-by: Milan Lakhani <milan.lakhani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/arm/booting.rst | 2 +- > > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/arm/Booting | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/arm/booting.rst b/Documentation/arm/booting.rst > > index a226345..5392d01 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/arm/booting.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/arm/booting.rst > > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ it. The recommended placement is in the first 16KiB of RAM. > > > > The boot loader must load a device tree image (dtb) into system ram > > at a 64bit aligned address and initialize it with the boot data. The > > -dtb format is documented in Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst. > > +dtb format is documented in Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst. > > Except that ... usage-model.rst doesn't actually document the DTB > format. Perhaps we should instead substitute a link that does what's > promised here? Yes, it's in the DT spec. I'd point to 'https://www.devicetree.org/specifications/' so it's always going to show the latest. And that's the link we have elsewhere in the kernel. usage-model.rst is also something needing updating... Rob
