On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:20:14AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:12:51 +0000 > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:47:18PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 02:24:46PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > + 3. Considerations > > > > + 3.1 Identifying successful termination > > > > > It looks like we forgot to update this with the addition of the new > > > section 3, so this needs a trivial update to add that and fix the > > > numbering. > > > > Bah, I thought the point with structured documentation formats was that > > tooling would handle stuff like this :/ > > The tooling *will* handle it if you let it, it's a simple matter of > replacing the hand-generated table of contents with a Sphinx directive. I > think that's generally the right thing to do, but it does have the > downside of only putting the TOC in the generated docs. Ah, I was not aware of that, and I had copied the TOC style from Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst. That does sound like the right thing to do generally, and I have no problem doing that here, but I guess we be consistent and either do that for all or none of the Documentation/livepatch/*.rst documents. I guess we could do that as a followup? Thanks, Mark.
