On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:49 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Lukas, > > Em Fri, 15 Jan 2021 07:12:38 +0100 > Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > [reduced the recipient list to the main responsible ones and list] > > > > Hi Mauro, hi Jonathan, > > > > We both, Mauro and I, have been submitting patches to address the > > documentation warnings on linux-next. If it is okay with you, Mauro, I > > would like to take responsibility for the task to send out the patches > > to address all warnings on linux-next in make htmldocs and follow up > > with all the discussions. I can also provide a short weekly summary > > (probably always on Friday) on what is pending where and what I could > > not resolve by myself. > > > > Is that okay for you? > > > > If at some point I do not have the time to take care anymore, I will > > let you know. > > Yeah, sure! > > Anyway, after applying the patches I sent this week, the warnings > I'm getting are all due to the validation scripts I wrote. So, if > everything gets merged (either yours or my version), we'll have zero > Sphinx/kernel-doc warnings again. > It is a never ending story... I already have seen two new warnings on today's linux-next and sent out patches. > $ scripts/documentation-file-ref-check > $ scripts/get_abi.pl validate I will also try out those two scripts, but I cannot commit to follow-up on all of those yet. I am also looking into addressing all kerneldoc warnings, even if not pulled in by make htmldocs. Lukas
