> -----Original Message----- > From: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 4:14 AM > To: Kelly, Seamus <seamus.kelly@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>; mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > markgross@xxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxx; > damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx; dragan.cvetic@xxxxxxxxxx; corbet@xxxxxxx; > leonard.crestez@xxxxxxx; palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx; > paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx; peng.fan@xxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ryan Carnaghi <ryan.r.carnaghi@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] xlink-ipc: Add xlink ipc driver > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:33:02AM +0000, Kelly, Seamus wrote: > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Must be something Seamus is using that knows when emails go outside. I would have caught this on our internal mock reviews otherwise. > > Now deleted! > > This footer is incompatible with Linux kernel development, please remove it in > order for us to read your emails and do anything with them. Yes, I know. > > I can't believe that Intel still has this problem, after all of these years... I'll add a warning about this in my training collateral and have all engineers I work with on this type of upstreaming send a test email to markgross@xxxxxxxxxx so I can see if they have such legal clauses appended to out-bound email that is not visible to internal recipients. I'll fix this. Sorry, --mark