On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:00:03AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:44:09 +0000 > Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 10:19:40AM +0000, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > > Document that /proc/PID/smaps shows PROT_MTE settings in VmFlags. > > > Support for this was introduced in > > > > > > commit 9f3419315f3cdc41a7318e4d50ba18a592b30c8c > > > arm64: mte: Add PROT_MTE support to mmap() and mprotect() > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@xxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > > Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > --- > > > Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst > > > index 533c79e8d2cd..e5fa972d4c76 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst > > > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst > > > @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ encoded manner. The codes are the following: > > > nh no huge page advise flag > > > mg mergable advise flag > > > bt arm64 BTI guarded page > > > + mt arm64 MTE allocation tags are enabled > > > == ======================================= > > > > > > Note that there is no guarantee that every flag and associated mnemonic will > > > > Are you ok with picking up this patch (it can be left for 5.11) or > > should I queue it in the arm64 tree? > > It wasn't sent to me, so it wasn't on my radar. Up to you, I'm happy to > grab it if you'd prefer. Please do grab it. Thanks. -- Catalin
