Am 12.11.20 um 04:33 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
On 11/11/20 7:24 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Am 03.10.20 um 09:27 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
Am 02.10.20 um 04:32 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: […]
> […]
Sorry for the mail with those overly long lines, seems Thunderbird does
not behave as it used to (or I did something stupid) :-/
I'm preparing to send v2 and was a bit unhappy with this and
another section when seeing it again after weeks. In the end I
reshuffled and rewrote significant parts of it, see below.
[…]
If you can not reproduce the issue with the mainline kernel,
consider sticking with it; if you'd like to use an older version
line and want to see it fixed there, first make sure it's still
supported. Install its latest release as vanilla kernel. If you
cannot reproduce the issue there, try to find the commit that fixed
it in mainline or any discussion preceding it: those will often
mention if backporting is planed or considered impassable. If
backporting was not discussed, ask if it's in the cards. In case
you don't find
impossible. ??
Hmmm, I didn't won't to use "impossible" as it often is possible, but
considered to hard/to much work. But I guess my dict sent me the wrong way.
I'll guess I'll switch to "considered too complex"
any commits or a preceding discussion, see the Linux-stable mailing
list archives for existing reports, as it might be a regression
specific to the version line. If it is, it round about needs to be
reported like a problem in mainline (including the bisection).
maybe: it still needs to be reported like
Went with:
If it is, report it like you would report a problem in mainline
(including the bisection).
If you reached this point without a solution, ask for advice one
the subsystem's mailing list. ```
Otherwise it looks good to me.
Many thanks for looking at it, much appreciated!
Ciao, Thorsten
