Re: [PATCH 01/13] seqnum_ops: Introduce Sequence Number Ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 09:41:40PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 12:53:27PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > +Decrement interface
> > +-------------------
> > +
> > +Decrements sequence number and doesn't return the new value. ::
> > +
> > +        seqnum32_dec() --> atomic_dec()
> > +        seqnum64_dec() --> atomic64_dec()
> 
> Why would you need to decrement a sequence number?  Shouldn't they just
> always go up?
> 
> I see you use them in your patch 12/13, but I don't think that really is
> a sequence number there, but rather just some other odd value :)

Note, other than this, I like the idea.  It makes it obvious what these
atomic variables are being used for, and they can't be abused for other
things.  Nice work.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux