On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:13:17 +0100 Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > JFYI, the code reading and writing the cache looks good to me. > > It is still possible that some entries might stay unused (filled > with zeroes) but it should be hard to hit in practice. It > is good enough from my POV. You mean the part that was commented? > > I do not give Reviewed-by tag just because I somehow do not have power > to review the entire patch carefully enough at the moment. No problem. Thanks for looking at it. I'm adding a link to this thread, so if someone wants proof you helped out on this code, you can have them follow the links ;-) Anyway, even if I push this to linux-next where I stop rebasing code (because of test coverage), I do rebase for adding tags. So if you ever get around at looking at this code, I can add that tag later (before the next merge window), or if you find something, I could fix it with a new patch and give you a Reported-by. -- Steve
