On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:14:38AM +1300, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 29/10/20 12:16 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Hi Geert,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:31 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > The pg_data_t node structures and their initialization currently depends on
> > > > !CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK. Since they are required only for DISCONTIGMEM
> > > > make this dependency explicit and replace usage of
> > > > CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK with CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM where appropriate.
> > > >
> > > > The CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK was implicitly disabled on the ColdFire MMU
> > > > variant, although it always presumed a single memory bank. As there is no
> > > > actual need for DISCONTIGMEM in this case, make sure that ColdFire MMU
> > > > systems set CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK to 'y'.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Thanks for your patch!
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu | 6 +++---
> > > > arch/m68k/include/asm/page_mm.h | 2 +-
> > > > arch/m68k/mm/init.c | 4 ++--
> > > > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > Is there any specific reason you didn't convert the checks for
> > > CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK in arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c
> > In arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c the CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK is needed
> > for the case when a system has two banks, the kernel is loaded into the
> > second bank and so the first bank cannot be used as normal memory. It
> > does not matter what memory model will be used in this case.
>
>
> That case used to be detected just fine at run time (by dint of the second
> memory chunk having an address below the first; the chunk the kernel resides
> in is always listed first), even without using CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK.
Right, CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK in arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c is used
to force using a single bank of memory regardless of run time detection.
> Unless you changed that behaviour (and I see nothing in your patch that
> would indicate that), this is still true.
>
> Converting the check as Geert suggested, without also adding a test for
> out-of-order memory bank addresses, would implicitly treat DISCONTIGMEM as
> SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK, regardless of bank ordering. I don't think that is what
> we really want?
It is in a way the case now when !SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK == DISCONTIGMEM.
So forcing SIGNLE_MEMORY_CHUNK at compile time would also mean forcing
FLATMEM.
After these changes I think SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK is not needed at all.
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
>
> >
> > > and arch/m68k/include/asm/virtconvert.h?
> > I remember I had build errors and troubles with include file
> > dependencies if I changed it there, but I might be mistaken. I'll
> > recheck again.
> >
> > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> > >
> > > Geert
> > >
> > > --
> > > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> > > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> > > -- Linus Torvalds
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
