On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:06:13 +0800 David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 2:38 PM 'SeongJae Park' via KUnit Development
> <kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > If 'CONFIG_KUNIT=m', letting kunit tests that do not support loadable
> > module build depends on 'KUNIT' instead of 'KUNIT=y' result in compile
> > errors. This commit updates the document for this.
> >
> > Fixes: 9fe124bf1b77 ("kunit: allow kunit to be loaded as a module")
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Sorry for the delay in looking at this. Apart from another minuscule
> typo below, this looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> -- David
>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes from v1
> > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201012105420.5945-1-sjpark@xxxxxxxxxx/):
> > - Fix a typo (Marco Elver)
> >
> > ---
> > Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 2 +-
> > Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> > index d23385e3e159..454f307813ea 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> > @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ Now add the following to ``drivers/misc/Kconfig``:
> >
> > config MISC_EXAMPLE_TEST
> > bool "Test for my example"
> > - depends on MISC_EXAMPLE && KUNIT
> > + depends on MISC_EXAMPLE && KUNIT=y
> >
> > and the following to ``drivers/misc/Makefile``:
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> > index 3c3fe8b5fecc..b331f5a5b0b9 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> > @@ -556,6 +556,11 @@ Once the kernel is built and installed, a simple
> >
> > ...will run the tests.
> >
> > +.. note::
> > + Note that you should make your test depends on ``KUNIT=y`` in Kconfig if the
> nit: Grammatically, this should technically be either "depend" (2nd
> person), or something like "make sure [that] your test depends".
Good eye! I will fix this in the next version.
Thanks,
SeongJae Park
