Em Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:49:23 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:53:15PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > This series actually folds the previous Sphinx 3.x patch series > > with the other patches I sent fixing warnings with Sphinx > > 2.x and with kernel-doc and that weren't merged yet via > > some other tree. > > > > It is based on the top of upstream, plus the media > > pull request I sent yesterday: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201012134139.0d58f5d7@xxxxxxxx/ > > > > My plan is to send a pull request with those patches after Thursday's > > linux next release. > > > > On this series, I removed the patches that depend on material > > currently found only at linux-next. > > Was a bit tricky to find the cover letter here and that you plan to > send these out this merge window. Sorry for that. As this series touch lots of subsystems, just c/c the maintainers mean more than 50 c/c to patch 00. Some e-mail servers may not accept e-mails with too many c/c people. Yet, checking at the c/c list of the original patch, you were copied on patch 00/80. So, maybe the e-mail server had silently dropped the original e-mail. > I think we'll have some confusion > now with Alex from amd having picked up a few already. I ended moving (at least part of) the drm patches from this series into a second one, as I'm intending to submit most of those patches today or tomorrow, and the remaining ones by the end of the merge window. > Anyway Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> for the > remaining drm patches. Thank you! > Although I can also pick them up to > drm-misc-next (but that's going to be 5.11 or so). It would be a way better to have them merged for 5.10, in order to have a clean html build there. Thanks, Mauro
