Em Tue, 13 Oct 2020 09:34:04 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:54:25PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Changeset 53c72b590b3a ("rcu/tree: cache specified number of objects")
> > added new members for struct kfree_rcu_cpu, but didn't add the
> > corresponding at the kernel-doc markup, as repoted when doing
> > "make htmldocs":
> > ./kernel/rcu/tree.c:3113: warning: Function parameter or member 'bkvcache' not described in 'kfree_rcu_cpu'
> > ./kernel/rcu/tree.c:3113: warning: Function parameter or member 'nr_bkv_objs' not described in 'kfree_rcu_cpu'
> >
> > So, move the description for bkvcache to kernel-doc, and add a
> > description for nr_bkv_objs.
> >
> > Fixes: 53c72b590b3a ("rcu/tree: cache specified number of objects")
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Queued for review and testing, likely target v5.11.
Hi Paul,
I would prefer if we could get those on 5.10, if possible.
We're aiming to have 5.10 free of docs warnings ;-)
If you prefer, I can send those patches to Linus with your
ack.
Regards,
Mauro
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 14 ++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index f78ee759af9c..03c54c3478b7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -3022,6 +3022,12 @@ struct kfree_rcu_cpu_work {
> > * @monitor_todo: Tracks whether a @monitor_work delayed work is pending
> > * @initialized: The @rcu_work fields have been initialized
> > * @count: Number of objects for which GP not started
> > + * @bkvcache:
> > + * A simple cache list that contains objects for reuse purpose.
> > + * In order to save some per-cpu space the list is singular.
> > + * Even though it is lockless an access has to be protected by the
> > + * per-cpu lock.
> > + * @nr_bkv_objs: number of allocated objects at @bkvcache.
> > *
> > * This is a per-CPU structure. The reason that it is not included in
> > * the rcu_data structure is to permit this code to be extracted from
> > @@ -3037,14 +3043,6 @@ struct kfree_rcu_cpu {
> > bool monitor_todo;
> > bool initialized;
> > int count;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * A simple cache list that contains objects for
> > - * reuse purpose. In order to save some per-cpu
> > - * space the list is singular. Even though it is
> > - * lockless an access has to be protected by the
> > - * per-cpu lock.
> > - */
> > struct llist_head bkvcache;
> > int nr_bkv_objs;
> > };
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
Thanks,
Mauro
