The Energy Model (EM) can store power values in milli-Watts or in abstract scale. This might cause issues in the subsystems which use the EM for estimating the device power, such as: - mixing of different scales in a subsystem which uses multiple (cooling) devices (e.g. thermal Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA)) - assuming that energy [milli-Joules] can be derived from the EM power values which might not be possible since the power scale doesn't have to be in milli-Watts To avoid misconfiguration add the needed documentation to the EM and related subsystems: EAS and IPA. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> --- .../driver-api/thermal/power_allocator.rst | 8 ++++++++ Documentation/power/energy-model.rst | 13 +++++++++++++ Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/thermal/power_allocator.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/thermal/power_allocator.rst index 67b6a3297238..5e04553ded5f 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/thermal/power_allocator.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/thermal/power_allocator.rst @@ -269,3 +269,11 @@ won't be very good. Note that this is not particular to this governor, step-wise will also misbehave if you call its throttle() faster than the normal thermal framework tick (due to interrupts for example) as it will overreact. + +Energy Model requirements +========================= + +Another important thing is the consistent scale of the power values +provided by the cooling devices. All of the cooling devices in a single +thermal zone should have power values reported either in milli-Watts +or scaled to the same 'abstract scale'. diff --git a/Documentation/power/energy-model.rst b/Documentation/power/energy-model.rst index a6fb986abe3c..ba7aa581b307 100644 --- a/Documentation/power/energy-model.rst +++ b/Documentation/power/energy-model.rst @@ -20,6 +20,19 @@ possible source of information on its own, the EM framework intervenes as an abstraction layer which standardizes the format of power cost tables in the kernel, hence enabling to avoid redundant work. +The power values might be expressed in milli-Watts or in an 'abstract scale'. +Multiple subsystems might use the EM and it is up to the system integrator to +check that the requirements for the power value scale types are met. An example +can be found in the Energy-Aware Scheduler documentation +Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst. For some subsystems like thermal or +powercap power values expressed in an 'abstract scale' might cause issues. +These subsystems are more interested in estimation of power used in the past, +thus the real milli-Watts might be needed. An example of these requirements can +be found in the Intelligent Power Allocation in +Documentation/driver-api/thermal/power_allocator.rst. +Important thing to keep in mind is that when the power values are expressed in +an 'abstract scale' deriving real energy in milli-Joules would not be possible. + The figure below depicts an example of drivers (Arm-specific here, but the approach is applicable to any architecture) providing power costs to the EM framework, and interested clients reading the data from it:: diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst index 001e09c95e1d..afe02d394402 100644 --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst @@ -350,6 +350,11 @@ independent EM framework in Documentation/power/energy-model.rst. Please also note that the scheduling domains need to be re-built after the EM has been registered in order to start EAS. +EAS uses the EM to make a forecasting decision on energy usage and thus it is +more focused on the difference when checking possible options for task +placement. For EAS it doesn't matter whether the EM power values are expressed +in milli-Watts or in an 'abstract scale'. + 6.3 - Energy Model complexity ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- 2.17.1
