Re: [patch 00/35] net: in_interrupt() cleanup and fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 27 2020 at 13:57, David Miller wrote:

> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:48:46 +0200
>
>> in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel configurations:
>
> Please respin this against net-next, some of the patches in here are already
> in net-next (the wireless debug macro one) and even after that the series
> doesn't build:

Will do.

> drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c: In function ‘enic_reset’:
> drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c:2315:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘enic_set_api_state’; did you mean ‘enic_set_api_busy’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>  2315 |  enic_set_api_state(enic, true);
>       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |  enic_set_api_busy
> At top level:
> drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c:2298:13: warning: ‘enic_set_api_busy’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  2298 | static void enic_set_api_busy(struct enic *enic, bool busy)
>       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Duh, not sure how I managed that. Sorry. will fix and rebase.

Thanks,

        tglx




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux