On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 21:49 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The usage of in_interrupt) in driver code is phased out. > > The iwlwifi_dbg tracepoint records in_interrupt() seperately, but that's > superfluous because the trace header already records all kind of state and > context information like hardirq status, softirq status, preemption count > etc. > > Aside of that the recording of in_interrupt() as boolean does not allow to > distinguish between the possible contexts (hard interrupt, soft interrupt, > bottom half disabled) while the trace header gives precise information. > > Remove the duplicate information from the tracepoint and fixup the caller. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Acked-by: Luca Coelho <luca@xxxxxxxxx> -- Luca.
