(+Cc Ingo, Peter) On 09/09/20 15:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > The name of the directory where the schedule docs are > stored are wrong on those files. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> This still stands from last posting: Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx> In the cover letter you mention resending a bunch of these (including this one) as they weren't picked up. Ingo / Peter, would you guys mind picking this one up in tip? AFAICT it's the only scheduler-related patch of the series. > --- > Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst | 2 +- > Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst > index 00bf0d011e2a..9b7cbe43b2d1 100644 > --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst > +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst > @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ giving it a high uclamp.min value. > .. note:: > > Wakeup CPU selection in CFS can be eclipsed by Energy Aware Scheduling > - (EAS), which is described in Documentation/scheduling/sched-energy.rst. > + (EAS), which is described in Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst. > > 5.1.3 Load balancing > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst > index 78f850778982..001e09c95e1d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst > +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst > @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ asymmetric CPU topologies for now. This requirement is checked at run-time by > looking for the presence of the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag when the scheduling > domains are built. > > -See Documentation/sched/sched-capacity.rst for requirements to be met for this > +See Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst for requirements to be met for this > flag to be set in the sched_domain hierarchy. > > Please note that EAS is not fundamentally incompatible with SMP, but no
