On 9/2/20 8:57 AM, Drew DeVault wrote: > This adds a link to https://useplaintext.email to email-clients.rst, > which is a more exhaustive resource on configuring various mail clients > for plain text use. submitting-patches.rst is also updated to direct > readers to email-clients.rst to equip new contributors with the > requisite knowledge to become a good participant on the mailing lists. > > Signed-off-by: Drew DeVault <sir@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Conflict of interest: I wrote and maintain the website this links to. > > Documentation/process/email-clients.rst | 5 +++++ > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/email-clients.rst b/Documentation/process/email-clients.rst > index c9e4ce2613c0..16586f6cc888 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/email-clients.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/email-clients.rst > @@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ attachments, but then the attachments should have content-type > it makes quoting portions of the patch more difficult in the patch > review process. > > +It's also strongly recommended that you use plain text in your email body, > +for patches and other emails alike. https://useplaintext.email may be useful You could justify that first sentence by adding that some mailing lists drop/discard emails that are in html. > +for information on how to configure your preferred email client, as well as > +listing recommended email clients should you not already have a preference. > + > Email clients that are used for Linux kernel patches should send the > patch text untouched. For example, they should not modify or delete tabs > or spaces, even at the beginning or end of lines. > diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > index f205753ae3d8..0dec104cb932 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > @@ -395,6 +395,9 @@ for their time. Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and > reviewers sometimes get grumpy. Even in that case, though, respond > politely and address the problems they have pointed out. > > +See :ref:`Documentation/process/email-clients.rst` for recommendations on email > +clients and mailing list etiquette. > + > > Don't get discouraged - or impatient > --------------------------------------- > Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- ~Randy