On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start > small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now. > > We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over > time. Also, note that LLVM's release process is different than GCC's. > GCC tends to have 1 major release per year while releasing minor updates > to the past 3 major versions. LLVM tends to support one major release > and one minor release every six months. > > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Note to reviewers: working remote, I'm having trouble testing/verifying > that I have the RST links wired up correctly; I would appreciate it if > someone is able to `make htmldocs` and check > Documentation/output/process/changes.html properly links to > Documentation/output/kbuild/llvm.html. I ran 'make O=out htmldocs' and can confirm that the link works properly in process/changes.html, pointing to kbuild/llvm.html. > Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 2 ++ > Documentation/process/changes.rst | 10 ++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > index 2aac50b97921..70ec6e9a183b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ > +.. _kbuild_llvm: > + > ============================== > Building Linux with Clang/LLVM > ============================== > diff --git a/Documentation/process/changes.rst b/Documentation/process/changes.rst > index ee741763a3fc..6c580ef9f2a3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/changes.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/changes.rst > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ you probably needn't concern yourself with pcmciautils. > Program Minimal version Command to check the version > ====================== =============== ======================================== > GNU C 4.9 gcc --version > +Clang/LLVM (optional) 10.0.1 clang --version Maybe it is worth making the "(optional)" a footnote like Sphinx? Seems to just kind of stick out to me but I do not have a strong opinion unless others do. > GNU make 3.81 make --version > binutils 2.23 ld -v > flex 2.5.35 flex --version > @@ -68,6 +69,15 @@ GCC > The gcc version requirements may vary depending on the type of CPU in your > computer. > > +Clang/LLVM (optional) > +--------------------- > + > +The latest formal release of clang and LLVM utils (according to > +`releases.llvm.org <https://releases.llvm.org>`_) are supported for building > +kernels. Older releases aren't gauranteed to work, and we may drop workarounds > +from the kernel that were used to support older versions. Please see additional > +docs on :ref:`Building Linux with Clang/LLVM <kbuild_llvm>`. > + Do we maybe want to add a section for LLVM/clang in the "Getting updated software" section? Maybe just a link to the existing section that we have in kbuild/llvm.rst? > Make > ---- > > -- > 2.28.0.297.g1956fa8f8d-goog > Regardless of the nits above: Reviewed-and-tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>
