Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for shadow stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/25/2020 12:19 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 8/25/20 11:43 AM, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_MMAP_SHSTK, u64 *args)
      Allocate a new shadow stack.

      The parameter 'args' is a pointer to a user buffer.

      *args = desired size
      *(args + 1) = MAP_32BIT or MAP_POPULATE

      On returning, *args is the allocated shadow stack address.

This is hideous.  Would this be better as a new syscall?

Could you point out why this is hideous, so that I can modify the
arch_prctl?

Passing values in memory is hideous when we don't have to.  A syscall
would let you have separate arguments for size and flags and would also
let you have a nice return value instead of needing to do that in memory
too.

That is a good justification.


I think this is more arch-specific.  Even if it becomes a new syscall,
we still need to pass the same parameters.

Right, but without the copying in and out of memory.

Linux-api is already on the Cc list. Do we need to add more people to get some agreements for the syscall?



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux