On 2020-08-10 at 17:09:51 +0200, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Le 10/08/2020 à 12:09, Tobias Klauser a écrit :
> > Support for these was added by commit aa65ff6b18e0 ("powerpc/64s:
> > Implement queued spinlocks and rwlocks").
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/features/locking/queued-rwlocks/arch-support.txt | 2 +-
> > .../features/locking/queued-spinlocks/arch-support.txt | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/features/locking/queued-rwlocks/arch-support.txt b/Documentation/features/locking/queued-rwlocks/arch-support.txt
> > index 5c6bcfcf8e1f..4dd5e554873f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/features/locking/queued-rwlocks/arch-support.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/features/locking/queued-rwlocks/arch-support.txt
> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> > | nios2: | TODO |
> > | openrisc: | ok |
> > | parisc: | TODO |
> > - | powerpc: | TODO |
> > + | powerpc: | ok |
>
> In your commit log you are refering to a commit titled "powerpc/64s:"
>
> Are you sure it is now OK for all powerpc, not only for book3s/64 as
> suggested by yout text ?
The change was generated by running
Documentation/features/scripts/features-refresh.sh
Sorry, I should have mentioned this in the commit message. I noticed the
updated features for powerpc after updating the RISC-V supported
features [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20200810095000.32092-1-tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
AFAIK, the features-refresh.sh script has no way of distinguishing
between different types of an architecture. It just checks for the
respective Kconfig symbols listed in the
Documentation/features/**/arch-support.txt files in all arch/**/Kconfig
files and updates the feature to "ok" if it finds the Kconfig symbol.
