On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 14:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled and > make it set the HWP minimum performance limit (HWP floor) to the > P-state value given by the target frequency supplied by the cpufreq > governor, so as to prevent the HWP algorithm and the CPU scheduler > from working against each other, at least when the schedutil governor > is in use, and update the intel_pstate documentation accordingly. > > Among other things, this allows utilization clamps to be taken > into account, at least to a certain extent, when intel_pstate is > in use and makes it more likely that sufficient capacity for > deadline tasks will be provided. > > After this change, the resulting behavior of an HWP system with > intel_pstate in the passive mode should be close to the behavior > of the analogous non-HWP system with intel_pstate in the passive > mode, except that in the frequency range below the base frequency > (ie. the frequency retured by the base_frequency cpufreq attribute > in sysfs on HWP systems) the HWP algorithm is allowed to make the > CPU run at a frequency above the floor P-state set by intel_pstate, > with or without hardware coordination of P-states among CPUs in the > same package. > > [If P-states of the CPUs in the same package are coordinated at the > hardware level, a non-HWP processor may choose a P-state above the > target one like a processor with HWP enabled may choose a P-state > above the HWP floor, so the HWP behavior is analogous to the non-HWP > one in that case. > > Also note that the HWP floor may not be taken into account by > the processor in the range of P-states above the base frequency, > referred to as the turbo range, where the processor has a license to > choose any P-state, either below or above the HWP floor, just like a > non-HWP processor in the case when the target P-state falls into the > turbo range.] > > With this change applied, intel_pstate in the passive mode > assumes complete control over the HWP request MSR and concurrent > changes of that MSR (eg. via the direct MSR access interface) are > overridden by it. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Sending the right patch this time, sorry for the confusion. > > This is based on the current mainline. > > v1 -> v2: > * Avoid a race condition when updating the HWP request register > while > setting a new EPP value via sysfs. > > v2 -> v3: > * Rebase. > > v3 -> v4: > * Avoid exposing the hwp_dynamic_boost sysfs switch in the passive > mode. > > v4 -> v5: > * Do not acquire intel_pstate_driver_lock in > store_energy_performance_preference(), because it runs under > policy->rwsem, so intel_pstate_driver cannot change while it is > running. > * Rearrange the changelog a bit to avoid confusion. > > v5 -> v6: > * Fix the problem with the EPP setting via sysfs not working with > the > performance and powersave governors by stopping and restarting > the > governor around the sysfs-based EPP updates in the passive mode. > * Because of that, use the epp_cached field just for avoiding the > above > if the new EPP value for the given CPU is the same as the old > one. > * Export cpufreq_start/stop_governor() from the core (for the > above). > > v6 -> v7: > * Cosmetic changes in store_energy_performance_prefernce() to > reduce the > LoC number and make it a bit easier to read. No intentional > functional > impact. > > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst | 89 ++++----- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 245 > +++++++++++++++++++------- > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 > 4 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > #define INTEL_PSTATE_SAMPLING_INTERVAL (10 * NSEC_PER_MSEC) > > #define INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_LATENCY 20000 > +#define INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY_HWP 5000 > #define INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY 500 > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > @@ -220,6 +221,7 @@ struct global_params { > * preference/bias > * @epp_saved: Saved EPP/EPB during system suspend or > CPU offline > * operation > + * @epp_cached Cached HWP energy-performance > preference value > * @hwp_req_cached: Cached value of the last HWP Request MSR > * @hwp_cap_cached: Cached value of the last HWP Capabilities MSR > * @last_io_update: Last time when IO wake flag was set > @@ -257,6 +259,7 @@ struct cpudata { > s16 epp_policy; > s16 epp_default; > s16 epp_saved; > + s16 epp_cached; > u64 hwp_req_cached; > u64 hwp_cap_cached; > u64 last_io_update; > @@ -639,6 +642,26 @@ static int intel_pstate_get_energy_pref_ > return index; > } > > +static int intel_pstate_set_epp(struct cpudata *cpu, u32 epp) > +{ > + /* > + * Use the cached HWP Request MSR value, because in the active > mode the > + * register itself may be updated by > intel_pstate_hwp_boost_up() or > + * intel_pstate_hwp_boost_down() at any time. > + */ > + u64 value = READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached); > + > + value &= ~GENMASK_ULL(31, 24); > + value |= (u64)epp << 24; > + /* > + * The only other updater of hwp_req_cached in the active mode, > + * intel_pstate_hwp_set(), is called under the same lock as > this > + * function, so it cannot run in parallel with the update > below. > + */ > + WRITE_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached, value); > + return wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, value); > +} > + > static int intel_pstate_set_energy_pref_index(struct cpudata > *cpu_data, > int pref_index, bool > use_raw, > u32 raw_epp) > @@ -650,28 +673,12 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_energy_pref_ > epp = cpu_data->epp_default; > > if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) { > - /* > - * Use the cached HWP Request MSR value, because the > register > - * itself may be updated by intel_pstate_hwp_boost_up() > or > - * intel_pstate_hwp_boost_down() at any time. > - */ > - u64 value = READ_ONCE(cpu_data->hwp_req_cached); > - > - value &= ~GENMASK_ULL(31, 24); > - > if (use_raw) > epp = raw_epp; > else if (epp == -EINVAL) > epp = epp_values[pref_index - 1]; > > - value |= (u64)epp << 24; > - /* > - * The only other updater of hwp_req_cached in the > active mode, > - * intel_pstate_hwp_set(), is called under the same > lock as this > - * function, so it cannot run in parallel with the > update below. > - */ > - WRITE_ONCE(cpu_data->hwp_req_cached, value); > - ret = wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu_data->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, > value); > + ret = intel_pstate_set_epp(cpu_data, epp); > } else { > if (epp == -EINVAL) > epp = (pref_index - 1) << 2; > @@ -697,10 +704,12 @@ static ssize_t show_energy_performance_a > > cpufreq_freq_attr_ro(energy_performance_available_preferences); > > +static struct cpufreq_driver intel_pstate; > + > static ssize_t store_energy_performance_preference( > struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf, size_t > count) > { > - struct cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; > + struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; > char str_preference[21]; > bool raw = false; > ssize_t ret; > @@ -725,15 +734,44 @@ static ssize_t store_energy_performance_ > raw = true; > } > > + /* > + * This function runs with the policy R/W semaphore held, which > + * guarantees that the driver pointer will not change while it > is > + * running. > + */ > + if (!intel_pstate_driver) > + return -EAGAIN; > + > mutex_lock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock); > > - ret = intel_pstate_set_energy_pref_index(cpu_data, ret, raw, > epp); > - if (!ret) > - ret = count; > + if (intel_pstate_driver == &intel_pstate) { > + ret = intel_pstate_set_energy_pref_index(cpu, ret, raw, > epp); > + } else { > + /* > + * In the passive mode the governor needs to be stopped > on the > + * target CPU before the EPP update and restarted after > it, > + * which is super-heavy-weight, so make sure it is > worth doing > + * upfront. > + */ > + if (!raw) > + epp = ret ? epp_values[ret - 1] : cpu- > >epp_default; > + > + if (cpu->epp_cached != epp) { > + int err; > + > + cpufreq_stop_governor(policy); > + ret = intel_pstate_set_epp(cpu, epp); > + err = cpufreq_start_governor(policy); > + if (!ret) { > + cpu->epp_cached = epp; > + ret = err; > + } > + } > + } > > mutex_unlock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock); > > - return ret; > + return ret ?: count; > } > > static ssize_t show_energy_performance_preference( > @@ -1145,8 +1183,6 @@ static ssize_t store_no_turbo(struct kob > return count; > } > > -static struct cpufreq_driver intel_pstate; > - > static void update_qos_request(enum freq_qos_req_type type) > { > int max_state, turbo_max, freq, i, perf_pct; > @@ -1330,9 +1366,10 @@ static const struct attribute_group inte > > static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pstate_cpu_ee_disable_ids[]; > > +static struct kobject *intel_pstate_kobject; > + > static void __init intel_pstate_sysfs_expose_params(void) > { > - struct kobject *intel_pstate_kobject; > int rc; > > intel_pstate_kobject = kobject_create_and_add("intel_pstate", > @@ -1357,17 +1394,31 @@ static void __init intel_pstate_sysfs_ex > rc = sysfs_create_file(intel_pstate_kobject, > &min_perf_pct.attr); > WARN_ON(rc); > > - if (hwp_active) { > - rc = sysfs_create_file(intel_pstate_kobject, > - &hwp_dynamic_boost.attr); > - WARN_ON(rc); > - } > - > if (x86_match_cpu(intel_pstate_cpu_ee_disable_ids)) { > rc = sysfs_create_file(intel_pstate_kobject, > &energy_efficiency.attr); > WARN_ON(rc); > } > } > + > +static void intel_pstate_sysfs_expose_hwp_dynamic_boost(void) > +{ > + int rc; > + > + if (!hwp_active) > + return; > + > + rc = sysfs_create_file(intel_pstate_kobject, > &hwp_dynamic_boost.attr); > + WARN_ON_ONCE(rc); > +} > + > +static void intel_pstate_sysfs_hide_hwp_dynamic_boost(void) > +{ > + if (!hwp_active) > + return; > + > + sysfs_remove_file(intel_pstate_kobject, > &hwp_dynamic_boost.attr); > +} > + > /************************** sysfs end ************************/ > > static void intel_pstate_hwp_enable(struct cpudata *cpudata) > @@ -2246,7 +2297,10 @@ static int intel_pstate_verify_policy(st > > static void intel_cpufreq_stop_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > { > - intel_pstate_set_min_pstate(all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]); > + if (hwp_active) > + intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf(policy->cpu); > + else > + intel_pstate_set_min_pstate(all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]); > } > > static void intel_pstate_stop_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > @@ -2254,12 +2308,10 @@ static void intel_pstate_stop_cpu(struct > pr_debug("CPU %d exiting\n", policy->cpu); > > intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu); > - if (hwp_active) { > + if (hwp_active) > intel_pstate_hwp_save_state(policy); > - intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf(policy->cpu); > - } else { > - intel_cpufreq_stop_cpu(policy); > - } > + > + intel_cpufreq_stop_cpu(policy); > } > > static int intel_pstate_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > @@ -2389,13 +2441,71 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_trace(struct c > fp_toint(cpu->iowait_boost * 100)); > } > > +static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(struct cpudata *cpu, u32 > target_pstate, > + bool fast_switch) > +{ > + u64 prev = READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached), value = prev; > + > + value &= ~HWP_MIN_PERF(~0L); > + value |= HWP_MIN_PERF(target_pstate); > + > + /* > + * The entire MSR needs to be updated in order to update the > HWP min > + * field in it, so opportunistically update the max too if > needed. > + */ > + value &= ~HWP_MAX_PERF(~0L); > + value |= HWP_MAX_PERF(cpu->max_perf_ratio); > + > + if (value == prev) > + return; > + > + WRITE_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached, value); > + if (fast_switch) > + wrmsrl(MSR_HWP_REQUEST, value); > + else > + wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, value); > +} > + > +static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf_ctl(struct cpudata *cpu, > + u32 target_pstate, bool > fast_switch) > +{ > + if (fast_switch) > + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL, > + pstate_funcs.get_val(cpu, target_pstate)); > + else > + wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu->cpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL, > + pstate_funcs.get_val(cpu, > target_pstate)); > +} > + > +static int intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu, int > target_pstate, > + bool fast_switch) > +{ > + int old_pstate = cpu->pstate.current_pstate; > + > + target_pstate = intel_pstate_prepare_request(cpu, > target_pstate); > + if (target_pstate != old_pstate) { > + cpu->pstate.current_pstate = target_pstate; > + if (hwp_active) > + intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(cpu, target_pstate, > + fast_switch); > + else > + intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf_ctl(cpu, > target_pstate, > + fast_switch); > + } > + > + intel_cpufreq_trace(cpu, fast_switch ? > INTEL_PSTATE_TRACE_FAST_SWITCH : > + INTEL_PSTATE_TRACE_TARGET, old_pstate); > + > + return target_pstate; > +} > + > static int intel_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > unsigned int target_freq, > unsigned int relation) > { > struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; > struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; > - int target_pstate, old_pstate; > + int target_pstate; > > update_turbo_state(); > > @@ -2403,6 +2513,7 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_target(struct c > freqs.new = target_freq; > > cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, &freqs); > + > switch (relation) { > case CPUFREQ_RELATION_L: > target_pstate = DIV_ROUND_UP(freqs.new, cpu- > >pstate.scaling); > @@ -2414,15 +2525,11 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_target(struct c > target_pstate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(freqs.new, cpu- > >pstate.scaling); > break; > } > - target_pstate = intel_pstate_prepare_request(cpu, > target_pstate); > - old_pstate = cpu->pstate.current_pstate; > - if (target_pstate != cpu->pstate.current_pstate) { > - cpu->pstate.current_pstate = target_pstate; > - wrmsrl_on_cpu(policy->cpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL, > - pstate_funcs.get_val(cpu, > target_pstate)); > - } > + > + target_pstate = intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(cpu, target_pstate, > false); > + > freqs.new = target_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; > - intel_cpufreq_trace(cpu, INTEL_PSTATE_TRACE_TARGET, > old_pstate); > + > cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, &freqs, false); > > return 0; > @@ -2432,15 +2539,14 @@ static unsigned int intel_cpufreq_fast_s > unsigned int target_freq) > { > struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; > - int target_pstate, old_pstate; > + int target_pstate; > > update_turbo_state(); > > target_pstate = DIV_ROUND_UP(target_freq, cpu->pstate.scaling); > - target_pstate = intel_pstate_prepare_request(cpu, > target_pstate); > - old_pstate = cpu->pstate.current_pstate; > - intel_pstate_update_pstate(cpu, target_pstate); > - intel_cpufreq_trace(cpu, INTEL_PSTATE_TRACE_FAST_SWITCH, > old_pstate); > + > + target_pstate = intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(cpu, target_pstate, > true); > + > return target_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; > } > > @@ -2460,7 +2566,6 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct > return ret; > > policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = > INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_LATENCY; > - policy->transition_delay_us = INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY; > /* This reflects the intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates() setting. */ > policy->cur = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq; > > @@ -2472,10 +2577,18 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct > > cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; > > - if (hwp_active) > + if (hwp_active) { > + u64 value; > + > intel_pstate_get_hwp_max(policy->cpu, &turbo_max, > &max_state); > - else > + policy->transition_delay_us = > INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY_HWP; > + rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, &value); > + WRITE_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached, value); > + cpu->epp_cached = (value & GENMASK_ULL(31, 24)) >> 24; > + } else { > turbo_max = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate; > + policy->transition_delay_us = > INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY; > + } > > min_freq = DIV_ROUND_UP(turbo_max * global.min_perf_pct, 100); > min_freq *= cpu->pstate.scaling; > @@ -2552,6 +2665,10 @@ static void intel_pstate_driver_cleanup( > } > } > put_online_cpus(); > + > + if (intel_pstate_driver == &intel_pstate) > + intel_pstate_sysfs_hide_hwp_dynamic_boost(); > + > intel_pstate_driver = NULL; > } > > @@ -2559,6 +2676,9 @@ static int intel_pstate_register_driver( > { > int ret; > > + if (driver == &intel_pstate) > + intel_pstate_sysfs_expose_hwp_dynamic_boost(); > + > memset(&global, 0, sizeof(global)); > global.max_perf_pct = 100; > > @@ -2576,9 +2696,6 @@ static int intel_pstate_register_driver( > > static int intel_pstate_unregister_driver(void) > { > - if (hwp_active) > - return -EBUSY; > - > cpufreq_unregister_driver(intel_pstate_driver); > intel_pstate_driver_cleanup(); > > @@ -2834,7 +2951,10 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_init(void > hwp_active++; > hwp_mode_bdw = id->driver_data; > intel_pstate.attr = hwp_cpufreq_attrs; > - default_driver = &intel_pstate; > + intel_cpufreq.attr = hwp_cpufreq_attrs; > + if (!default_driver) > + default_driver = &intel_pstate; > + > goto hwp_cpu_matched; > } > } else { > @@ -2905,14 +3025,13 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_setup(cha > if (!str) > return -EINVAL; > > - if (!strcmp(str, "disable")) { > + if (!strcmp(str, "disable")) > no_load = 1; > - } else if (!strcmp(str, "active")) { > + else if (!strcmp(str, "active")) > default_driver = &intel_pstate; > - } else if (!strcmp(str, "passive")) { > + else if (!strcmp(str, "passive")) > default_driver = &intel_cpufreq; > - no_hwp = 1; > - } > + > if (!strcmp(str, "no_hwp")) { > pr_info("HWP disabled\n"); > no_hwp = 1; > Index: linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst > +++ linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst > @@ -54,10 +54,13 @@ registered (see `below <status_attr_>`_) > Operation Modes > =============== > > -``intel_pstate`` can operate in three different modes: in the active > mode with > -or without hardware-managed P-states support and in the passive > mode. Which of > -them will be in effect depends on what kernel command line options > are used and > -on the capabilities of the processor. > +``intel_pstate`` can operate in two different modes, active or > passive. In the > +active mode, it uses its own internal preformance scaling governor > algorithm or > +allows the hardware to do preformance scaling by itself, while in > the passive > +mode it responds to requests made by a generic ``CPUFreq`` governor > implementing > +a certain performance scaling algorithm. Which of them will be in > effect > +depends on what kernel command line options are used and on the > capabilities of > +the processor. > > Active Mode > ----------- > @@ -194,10 +197,11 @@ This is the default operation mode of `` > hardware-managed P-states (HWP) support. It is always used if the > ``intel_pstate=passive`` argument is passed to the kernel in the > command line > regardless of whether or not the given processor supports > HWP. [Note that the > -``intel_pstate=no_hwp`` setting implies ``intel_pstate=passive`` if > it is used > -without ``intel_pstate=active``.] Like in the active mode without > HWP support, > -in this mode ``intel_pstate`` may refuse to work with processors > that are not > -recognized by it. > +``intel_pstate=no_hwp`` setting causes the driver to start in the > passive mode > +if it is not combined with ``intel_pstate=active``.] Like in the > active mode > +without HWP support, in this mode ``intel_pstate`` may refuse to > work with > +processors that are not recognized by it if HWP is prevented from > being enabled > +through the kernel command line. > > If the driver works in this mode, the ``scaling_driver`` policy > attribute in > ``sysfs`` for all ``CPUFreq`` policies contains the string > "intel_cpufreq". > @@ -318,10 +322,9 @@ manuals need to be consulted to get to i > > For this reason, there is a list of supported processors in > ``intel_pstate`` and > the driver initialization will fail if the detected processor is not > in that > -list, unless it supports the `HWP feature <Active Mode_>`_. [The > interface to > -obtain all of the information listed above is the same for all of > the processors > -supporting the HWP feature, which is why they all are supported by > -``intel_pstate``.] > +list, unless it supports the HWP feature. [The interface to obtain > all of the > +information listed above is the same for all of the processors > supporting the > +HWP feature, which is why ``intel_pstate`` works with all of them.] > > > User Space Interface in ``sysfs`` > @@ -425,22 +428,16 @@ argument is passed to the kernel in the > as well as the per-policy ones) are then reset to their default > values, possibly depending on the target operation mode.] > > - That only is supported in some configurations, though (for > example, if > - the `HWP feature is enabled in the processor <Active Mode With > HWP_>`_, > - the operation mode of the driver cannot be changed), and if it > is not > - supported in the current configuration, writes to this > attribute will > - fail with an appropriate error. > - > ``energy_efficiency`` > - This attribute is only present on platforms, which have CPUs > matching > - Kaby Lake or Coffee Lake desktop CPU model. By default > - energy efficiency optimizations are disabled on these CPU > models in HWP > - mode by this driver. Enabling energy efficiency may limit > maximum > - operating frequency in both HWP and non HWP mode. In non HWP > mode, > - optimizations are done only in the turbo frequency range. In > HWP mode, > - optimizations are done in the entire frequency range. Setting > this > - attribute to "1" enables energy efficiency optimizations and > setting > - to "0" disables energy efficiency optimizations. > + This attribute is only present on platforms with CPUs matching > the Kaby > + Lake or Coffee Lake desktop CPU model. By default, energy- > efficiency > + optimizations are disabled on these CPU models if HWP is > enabled. > + Enabling energy-efficiency optimizations may limit maximum > operating > + frequency with or without the HWP feature. With HWP enabled, > the > + optimizations are done only in the turbo frequency > range. Without it, > + they are done in the entire available frequency range. Setting > this > + attribute to "1" enables the energy-efficiency optimizations > and setting > + to "0" disables them. > > Interpretation of Policy Attributes > ----------------------------------- > @@ -484,8 +481,8 @@ Next, the following policy attributes ha > policy for the time interval between the last two invocations > of the > driver's utilization update callback by the CPU scheduler for > that CPU. > > -One more policy attribute is present if the `HWP feature is enabled > in the > -processor <Active Mode With HWP_>`_: > +One more policy attribute is present if the HWP feature is enabled > in the > +processor: > > ``base_frequency`` > Shows the base frequency of the CPU. Any frequency above this > will be > @@ -526,11 +523,11 @@ on the following rules, regardless of th > > 3. The global and per-policy limits can be set independently. > > -If the `HWP feature is enabled in the processor <Active Mode With > HWP_>`_, the > -resulting effective values are written into its registers whenever > the limits > -change in order to request its internal P-state selection logic to > always set > -P-states within these limits. Otherwise, the limits are taken into > account by > -scaling governors (in the `passive mode <Passive Mode_>`_) and by > the driver > +In the `active mode with the HWP feature enabled <Active Mode With > HWP_>`_, the > +resulting effective values are written into hardware registers > whenever the > +limits change in order to request its internal P-state selection > logic to always > +set P-states within these limits. Otherwise, the limits are taken > into account > +by scaling governors (in the `passive mode <Passive Mode_>`_) and by > the driver > every time before setting a new P-state for a CPU. > > Additionally, if the ``intel_pstate=per_cpu_perf_limits`` command > line argument > @@ -541,12 +538,11 @@ at all and the only way to set the limit > Energy vs Performance Hints > --------------------------- > > -If ``intel_pstate`` works in the `active mode with the HWP feature > enabled > -<Active Mode With HWP_>`_ in the processor, additional attributes > are present > -in every ``CPUFreq`` policy directory in ``sysfs``. They are > intended to allow > -user space to help ``intel_pstate`` to adjust the processor's > internal P-state > -selection logic by focusing it on performance or on energy- > efficiency, or > -somewhere between the two extremes: > +If the hardware-managed P-states (HWP) is enabled in the processor, > additional > +attributes, intended to allow user space to help ``intel_pstate`` to > adjust the > +processor's internal P-state selection logic by focusing it on > performance or on > +energy-efficiency, or somewhere between the two extremes, are > present in every > +``CPUFreq`` policy directory in ``sysfs``. They are : > > ``energy_performance_preference`` > Current value of the energy vs performance hint for the given > policy > @@ -650,12 +646,14 @@ of them have to be prepended with the `` > Do not register ``intel_pstate`` as the scaling driver even if > the > processor is supported by it. > > +``active`` > + Register ``intel_pstate`` in the `active mode <Active Mode_>`_ > to start > + with. > + > ``passive`` > Register ``intel_pstate`` in the `passive mode <Passive > Mode_>`_ to > start with. > > - This option implies the ``no_hwp`` one described below. > - > ``force`` > Register ``intel_pstate`` as the scaling driver instead of > ``acpi-cpufreq`` even if the latter is preferred on the given > system. > @@ -670,13 +668,12 @@ of them have to be prepended with the `` > driver is used instead of ``acpi-cpufreq``. > > ``no_hwp`` > - Do not enable the `hardware-managed P-states (HWP) feature > - <Active Mode With HWP_>`_ even if it is supported by the > processor. > + Do not enable the hardware-managed P-states (HWP) feature even > if it is > + supported by the processor. > > ``hwp_only`` > Register ``intel_pstate`` as the scaling driver only if the > - `hardware-managed P-states (HWP) feature <Active Mode With > HWP_>`_ is > - supported by the processor. > + hardware-managed P-states (HWP) feature is supported by the > processor. > > ``support_acpi_ppc`` > Take ACPI ``_PPC`` performance limits into account. > Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -73,8 +73,6 @@ static inline bool has_target(void) > static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); > static int cpufreq_init_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); > static void cpufreq_exit_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); > -static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); > -static void cpufreq_stop_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); > static void cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); > static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > struct cpufreq_governor *new_gov, > @@ -2266,7 +2264,7 @@ static void cpufreq_exit_governor(struct > module_put(policy->governor->owner); > } > > -static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > { > int ret; > > @@ -2293,7 +2291,7 @@ static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct > return 0; > } > > -static void cpufreq_stop_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +void cpufreq_stop_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > { > if (cpufreq_suspended || !policy->governor) > return; > Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h > +++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h > @@ -576,6 +576,8 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq > unsigned int cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(struct > cpufreq_policy *policy); > int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor); > void cpufreq_unregister_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor); > +int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); > +void cpufreq_stop_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); > > #define cpufreq_governor_init(__governor) \ > static int __init __governor##_init(void) \ > > >